The cutest wader in the world has to be the ‘critically endangered’ Spoon-billed Sandpiper, a tiny wader with an ice-cream spoon for a bill. An ever-reducing number of pairs breed in the coastal tundra of north-east Russia. They migrate to south-east Asia, spending the winter months anywhere between China and Bangladesh.
During autumn there are sightings of moulting Spoon-billed Sandpipers around the mudflats of the Yellow Sea (People’s Republic of China, Democratic People’s Republic of Korea (DPRK) and Republic of Korea). Where else do Spoon-billed Sandpipers go? A new paper shows that it is possible to trace potentially important missing sites by tracking individuals.
Away from their breeding areas, Spoon-billed Sandpipers are threatened by:
- Loss of non-breeding habitats, especially intertidal mudflats, because of land-claim projects to create harbours, industry zones, wind and solar power generation farms, aquaculture ponds and rice-fields.
- The spread of invasive Spartina species (cordgrass) across mudflats in some coastal areas of China, the Republic of Korea and Japan is reducing the available feeding area.
- Local hunting pressure, for personal consumption and local trade.
- Accidental losses of birds tangled in permanently set fishing nets.
There is more about these issues and efforts to reduce problems being faced by waders on the East Asian-Australasian Flyway on the Saving the Spoon-billed Sandpiper website.
Better information on the location and timing of use of stopover and wintering sites is essential if conservation measures to prevent hunting and further losses of intertidal habitat are to be applied across the species’ range. In a new paper in Wader Study, Prof Qing Chang and colleagues describe in detail the post-breeding migration of adult Spoon-billed Sandpipers. For the first time, they are able to report on the timing of the migration, the duration of stay at stop-over sites, and the distances travelled between stop-overs.
The research team captured 13 adult Spoon-billed Sandpipers and fitted each bird with a solar-powered transmitter that reports the bird’s locations, via satellites. Six were caught on their nests in Chukotka and seven were netted at Tiaozini in Jiangsu Province, near Shanghai in China. The paper contains full information on the tags, which were glue-mounted to the back of the birds, and details of the data collected and the algorithms used to interpret groupings of locations. This will be of help to anyone considering using these devices.
Why use Satellite transmitters?
Information from colour-ringing and counting has produced fascinating information about Spoon-billed Sandpipers. We now know more about the breeding, migration and wintering locations of the total population, estimated at just 660 individuals in 2014, than we did in 2010, when the serious plight of the species became more widely apparent (Clark et al). There has been international support for conservation action in non-breeding hot-spots in Myanmar, Bangladesh and China, where waders are benefiting from measures designed to reduce hunting pressure and maintain feeding habitat.
The amount of information that can be obtained from counts and colour-ring sightings is limited by knowledge of where to look for birds. There are still big questions to ask. Where do birds colour-ringed in Russia, but not yet seen, spend the winter, where are the breeding grounds for birds ringed in the winter and then not seen in the summer, and what happens to birds in the weeks when they are on migration? Geolocators or satellite transmitters might provide some answers.
Geolocators are great, but information can only be downloaded from these devices by recapturing tagged birds and there is poor precision of reports received during the equinox periods (late March and late September), when daylength doesn’t change with latitude and many waders are on the move. Additionally, given the tiny size of the population and the mobility of breeding birds, recapturing birds to remove geolocators is unlikely to be as easy as it has been for many other wader species. Finally, as has been discussed in a previous WaderTales blog, geolocators can have unanticipated negative consequences for small calidrid sandpipers.
Health & Safety
Every Spoon-billed Sandpiper is precious, so safety is of paramount importance in tagging studies. Prior to deployment on Spoon-billed Sandpipers, tags of the same weight and dimensions were trialled on ‘surrogate’ birds – a small flock of twelve captive-reared Dunlin. The health of these birds was monitored in an aviary and birds seemed to behave normally. Would the same be true for similarly-sized Spoon-billed Sandpipers that migrate thousands of kilometres? Imagine the relief when the first tagged wild bird took off a few days after tagging and started to reveal unique insights into the species’ migration!
From Russia with tags
The six adults captured on the nest and tagged in subarctic Chukotka, Russia, left in July and moved west and south through Kamchatka in July and early August. This was followed by long flights (>1,000 km) across the Sea of Okhotsk to Sakhalin Island. By this stage, only four of the tags were still functioning but these birds provided some fascinating information:
- All four birds used the same area (Tyk Bay) on the western side of Sakhalin Island. They stayed for long periods and all flew long distances when they left – which means that this site and the resources it provides are really important!
- The next leg of the journey took the birds further south to sites within Russia and to the Democratic People’s Republic of Korea. All four ended up in DPRK.
- Two birds stayed long enough to moult close to the Demilitarised Zone in the DPRK but the other two moved on and spent a month moulting at two different sites in Jiangsu Province, China.
- By this point, in the late autumn, it is believed that all four birds had moulted. Given the method of tag attachment, it was thought that birds would drop their tags during moult, but one bird (L07) continued to transmit data.
- The four individuals that were tracked between the breeding area and their presumed moulting sites stopped for 2 days or more at between 3 and 7 sites.
Seven birds were tagged in Tiaozini in Jiangsu Province. With L07 still transmitting, that meant that there were eight birds to track during the next stage of the migration season. Would they be able to trace missing sites that could potentially be protected.
- All eight of these birds moved west and south in October or early November.
- Three birds moved to separate sites in southern China, where they remained until their tags ceased to provide data.
- Five birds visited stopover sites in China before moving on to their wintering areas in Vietnam, Myanmar, Sumatra and Bangladesh. Sumatra is outside the previously-known wintering range.
- One of the birds that flew to Bangladesh stopped in Vietnam and Myanmar, while the other one stopped in the Gulf of Thailand. It then overflew Malaysia, Myanmar and the Bay of Bengal before transmissions ceased just before arrival in Bangladesh.
- The eight individuals that were tracked between moulting and wintering grounds trace out a vast coastline (figure) – illustrating the conservation challenges of trying to save the Spoon-billed Sandpiper. Only two of the birds finished up at well-known sites that are covered regularly by winter counts.
Identifying sites of conservation importance
With only thirteen tagged birds providing four links between breeding and moulting areas and eight links between moulting and wintering areas, the research team have greatly increased our understanding of how it might be possible to protect Spoon-billed Sandpipers. As the authors point out in their Discussion, however, the “list of stopover sites is not comprehensive because of the small number of birds tagged and the duration of stay criterion we used”. Seventeen sites were visited by only one bird and other sites where Spoon-billed Sandpipers are regularly seen were not visited by any of the tagged birds. This suggests that there are probably other important sites that are yet to be traced. The authors suggest some of the limitations created by sampling. The key findings are:
- During the post-breeding migration, several sites appeared to be of special importance. Seven stop-over sites were used for long periods or were used by birds immediately before long flights (or both).
- Tyk Bay (Sakhalin, Russia) and Ryongmae Mudflat (DPRK) were used as stopovers by all the tagged birds that passed beyond these sites. Neither site was previously thought to be important for Spoon-billed Sandpipers.
- The post-breeding moult period is an energetically expensive stage of a wader’s annual cycle. For Spoon-billed Sandpipers, Ryongmae Mudflat (DPRK), Tiaozini (China) and Yangkou (China) are of special importance in this regard (Green et al. 2018, Chang et al. 2019, Yang et al. 2020).
- Most of the sites in which tagged birds spent the winter months had not previously been visited by count teams. Subsequent visits to some of these previously unknown sites in China added counts of 77 birds.
Once tags had fallen off, birds could still be located by their leg-flags if they were seen by teams of observers who visited known moulting, stop-over and wintering locations. Seven of the birds that carried transmitters have been seen in subsequent years at similar times and places. This suggests that birds are site-faithful between years, implying that a site that is identified to be of importance is really important – birds are not randomly choosing mudflats on a whim.
The stopover-site clusters of registrations were all located on or near coasts, except for one, used briefly, on sandbanks in the Irrawaddy River, Myanmar. Most clusters included areas of intertidal mudflats, especially on estuaries. However, a few included other habitats, such as saltpans and fishponds in impounded areas which had previously been intertidal. Ten of the 28 clusters have some protection under national legislation or international agreements, a further eleven clusters are recognised as Key Biodiversity Areas and/or East Asian-Australasian Flyway Network Sites, but seven clusters appear to have neither protection nor international recognition.
The lack of protection of wintering sites is of concern because of continuing threats to Spoon-billed Sandpipers and their habitats. Hunting of Spoon-billed Sandpipers remains a problem, for instance. This is illustrated by a story from the paper.
During a visit to site Guankoudu (Fujian Province, China) in December 2016, occasioned by the tracking of one of the tagged birds, many mist-nets, more than 2 km in total length, were found, some of which held entangled live and dead shorebirds. This site has no legal protection, but this illegal bird-trapping was reported to local government agencies, whose staff quickly began the removal and destruction of the nets.
If sites are identified, protection is possible.
Background to this work on Spoon-billed Sandpipers
The Spoon-billed Sandpiper conservation programme, which includes research, site protection, conservation breeding and head-starting, is a collaboration between the Wildlife & Wetlands Trust (WWT), Birds Russia, Moscow Zoo and the RSPB, working with colleagues from the BTO, BirdLife International, ArcCona, Nanjing Normal University, Spoon-billed Sandpiper in China, Hong Kong Waterbirds Ringing Group, Microwave Telemetry and the Spoon-Billed Sandpiper Task Force.
The project is supported by WWT, RSPB, the UK Government’s Darwin Initiative and SOS – Save our Species, with additional financial contributions and support from BirdLife International, the East-Asian Australasian Flyway Partnership, the Convention on Migratory Species, Heritage Expeditions, the Australasian Wader Study Group of Birds Australia, the BBC Wildlife Fund, Avios, the Olive Herbert Charitable Trust, the Oriental Bird Club, British Airways Communities & Conservation Scheme, New Zealand Department of Conservation, the Queensland Wader Study Group, New South Wales Wader Study Group, Chester Zoo, Wader Quest, Dutch Birding, OSME and British Birds Charitable Trust and many generous individuals. Leica Camera AG is WWT’s exclusive optic partner for this key conservation project.
An assessment of the conservation status of the species can be found on the BirdLife International site:
To read more about the project to set up a captive breeding population and head-start Spoon-billed Sandpiper chicks in their Russian breeding grounds visit the Saving Spoon-billed Sandpiper website.
There is lots of information on the conservation action to protect the species on the Saving the Spoonbill Sandpiper website and on the East Asian-Australasian Flyway Partnership Website. Here’s one example.
Many wader species on the East Asian-Australasian Flyway are threatened by habitat loss, as discussed in this WaderTales blog.
Paper in Wader Study
Post-breeding migration of adult Spoon-billed Sandpipers Qing Chang, Evgeny E. Syroechkovskiy, Guy Q.A. Anderson, Pyae-Phyo Aung, Alison E. Beresford, Kane Brides, Sayam U. Chowdhury, Nigel A. Clark, Jacquie A. Clark, Paul Howey, Baz Hughes, Paul Insua-Cao, Yifei Jia, Elena Lappo, Katherine K.S. Leung, Egor Y. Loktionov, Jonathan Martinez, David S. Melville, James Phillips, Chairunas Adha Putra, Pavel S. Tomkovich, Ewan Weston, Jenny Weston, Nikolay Yakushev & Rhys E. Green. Wader Study 127(3): doi:10.18194/ws.00201
WaderTales blogs are written by Graham Appleton (@GrahamFAppleton) to celebrate waders and wader research. Many of the articles are based on published papers, with the aim of making shorebird science available to a broader audience.